ACAST | NASA Advanced CNS Architectures and System Technologies | Glenn Research Center

• “COMModitizing the Airspace” – Dave Witchey, United Airlines
• “Vision of the Future Air Transportation” – Mike Harrison, Federal Aviation Administration, ASD-100
• “Air Transportation System – Beyond Tomorrow” – Frank Aguilera, NASA Ames Research Center
• “Aviation Safety Program” – Doug Rohn, NASA Glenn Research Center
• “The Small Aircraft Transportation System Program: A Potential Solution to Future Transportation Needs” – Dave Hahne, NASA Langley Research Center (presented by Mike Zernic, NASA Glenn Research Center)

• “Smart Landing Facility” – Steve Bussolari, Lincoln Labs
• “Safe Flight 21 and Airport Surface Technology Program Overview” – Ken Leonard, Federal Aviation Administration, AND-500
• “UAT Technical Aspects and MOPS Status” – Jim Dieudonne, MITRE/CAASD
• “FAA Loran-C Initiatives” – Jim Nagle, Booz-Allen & Hamilton
• “CPDLC and C-CAST” – Jim Rankin, Ohio University Avionics Engineering Center

• “Flight Information Service Data Link Through FAA-Industry Agreements” – Ernie Dash, Raytheon
• “The Aeronautical Telecommunication Network, a Cooperative Venture” – Mike Murphy, ATNSI
• “Avionics R&D for CNS/ATM Environment in China” – Shimin Gu, Chinese Aero Radio Electronics Research Institute
• “MTSAT: Multi-Functional Tranport Satellite for CNS/ATM in the Asia Pacific” -Ken Faller, Space Systems Loral (unable to attend)

• “Airline Perspective” – Abe Jaafar, Delta Airlines
• “FAA Spectrum Management” – Brandy Ingargiola, Federal Aviation Administration
• “Expanding Hopkins to Meet Air Traffic Needs” – Mark Vanloh, Cleveland Hopkins Airport
  • Text of Mark Vanloh’s speech
• “CNS Data Link – Avionics Manufacturer Perspective” – Steve Koczo, Rockwell Collins
• “GA Perspective” – Noel Schmidt, Architecture Technology Corporation

Dinner at the Crawford Auto-Aviation Museum at the Western Reserve Historical Society. Bus transportation from the Wyndham Hotel to the Museum provided.

• Evening Keynote Address Bruce Holmes, NASA Langley Research Center

• “CNS Technical Architecture – Modernization Status and Future Plans” – Michael Harrison, Federal Aviation Administration, ASD-100
• “Communications System Architecture Technical Analyses for Air Traffic Management and Weather Information Dissemination for 2007 and 2015” – Doug Blythe, Aeronautical Radio, Inc.
• “NASA Datalink Communications Research and Technology Development for Aeronautics” – Gus Martzaklis, NASA Glenn Research Center
• “Use of Next-Generation Satellite Systems for Aeronautical Communications: Research Issues” – Toni Trani, Virginia Tech
• “Data Link Communication Decision Choices – Meeting Commercial Air Traveler Stakeholders’ Expected Value” – Paul Mallasch, Scitor Enterprises, Inc.
• “The DoD Advanced Wideband System: Analysis of Alternatives for Wideband Military Satellite Communications in the 2008+ Timeframe” – Roy Axford, Space & Naval Warfare Systems Center

• “2020 Aeronautical Communications Architecture Issues” – Chris Wargo, Computer Networks & Software, Inc.
• “Next Generation Collaborative Traffic Flow Management Systems” – Mike Ball, University of Maryland
• “An Airframer’s Perspective on the Far Term” – Jean-Paul Moreaux, EADS Airbus
• “Future of the National Airspace System” – Neal Planzer, United State Air Force, DoD (No paper given.)
• “GA Perspectives: Present and Future” – Richard Weiss, Atlantic Southeast Airlines
• “Beyond 2010, A NAS Evolution” – Mike Harrison, Federal Aviation Administration (No paper given.)

1. Near and Mid Term CNS Technology R&D Needs, Palace Ballroom West: Define critical near and mid term (next 10 years) CNS technology R&D needs.
2. Far Term CNS Technology R&D Needs, Allen Room: Define critical far term (beyond 10 years) CNS technology R&D needs.
3. Assessment of Current CNS Technology R&D Programs), State Room: Assess current R&D efforts in terms of what needs are being met and what needs are not being met.
4. 2020 Operational Concepts, Roxy Room: Define operational concepts (which result in CNS R&D requirements) that can be considered to have a reasonable degree of industry consensus.
5. Organizing the R&D Community and Advocacy, Hanna Room: Examine the level and type of organization of the CNS R&D community that is needed: does the organizational structure already exist or does it need to be created? How can such an organization effectively function in coordinating R&D activities and advocacy efforts?

• Executive Team Outbriefing Report, NASA Glenn Visitor Center Auditorium
• Integrated CNS Workshop Conclusions and Recommendations (Final Report)